Reviewer Guidelines for the Journal of Empirical Social Science Studies

Thank you for agreeing to serve as a peer reviewer for the Journal of Empirical Social Science Studies. Your expertise and critical evaluation are vital in maintaining the quality and integrity of our journal. These guidelines will assist you in conducting a thorough and fair review.

1. Confidentiality

• Maintain the confidentiality of the review process: Do not discuss the manuscript or share it with anyone outside of the review process.
• Ensure that all manuscript and review details remain confidential both during and after the review process.

2. Conflict of Interest

• Declare any potential conflict of interest with the author(s) or the manuscript's content. This includes any professional, financial, or personal relationships that might bias your review.
• If you believe you cannot provide an objective review, inform the editor and recuse yourself from the review process.

3. Assessment Criteria

• Evaluate the manuscript's originality, relevance, and contribution to the field of empirical social science studies.
• Assess the validity of the methodology, the accuracy of the results, and the soundness of the conclusions.
• Consider the clarity and coherence of the presentation, including the quality of writing, figures, and tables.
• Ensure the manuscript adheres to ethical guidelines, including proper attribution of sources and avoidance of plagiarism.

4. Constructive Feedback

• Provide constructive feedback, offering specific suggestions for improvement where necessary.
• Critique the content of the manuscript, not the author(s).
• Avoid dismissive or derogatory comments; focus on providing clear, objective, and reasoned feedback.

5. Timeliness

• Adhere to the review timeline provided by the journal. If you anticipate a delay, inform the editor as soon as possible.
• Complete your review within the agreed timeframe to ensure a timely publication process.

6. Review Report

• Structure your report clearly, summarizing the main findings of the manuscript and your evaluation of its strengths and weaknesses.
• Provide a recommendation regarding the publication of the manuscript (accept, revise, reject).
• Justify your recommendation with specific references to the manuscript and the assessment criteria.

7. Post-Review Process

• Be available for follow-up questions or to review revised versions of the manuscript, if requested by the editor.
• Respect the final decision made by the journal's editor(s).

We appreciate your contribution to maintaining the high standards of the Journal of Empirical Social Science Studies.